Saree in Law

Saree is well-known Indian attire worn by women not only in India but around the world. It has captivated audiences since time immemorial due to its sensuality and versatility. A saree can be draped in numerous ways that highlight its versatility, culture, tradition, community, occasion, and beauty. Saree is an imperative part of the Indian tradition and culture. Whether it’s Madisari, a saree-draping style that was traditionally worn by women after their marriage in the Iyengar and Iyer culture of Tamil Nadu, or the Atpoure Shari, the saree draping style of West Bengal or Kappulu a saree draping style of the older women in Andhra Pradesh or the Nauvari worn like a dhoti in Maharashtra, the draping or tying style of an unstitched garment or 3.5 to 9-yard saree, varies by region, community, functionality, and, on occasion. In a world full of ever-changing fashion trends and fast fashion, Indian sarees and the traditional draping style remain constant. India has a treasure trove of saree styles and different ways of draping them that have even inspired the international fashion world.

Despite this India lacks a law regime to protect the saree draping styles. The Indian Trademark Act 1999 can protect the brands selling sarees while the prints and designs can be protected under the Copyright Act 1957 under original artistic work or the Designs Act 2000 for the designs aesthetically appealing. However, one may think to protect saree draping under ‘any other work of artistic craftsmanship’ under the Copyright Act 1957[1], but issues related to calculating the time, originality, and who to attribute the authorship arise. While the most obvious branch of IP the mind associates to saree is Geographical Indications, however, registered GIs under the Geographical Indication Act 199 like Bhagalpuri silks, Kanchipuram silks, Mysore, and Muga silks, which are world-famous as fabrics associated primarily with sarees.  Further, saree draping is fundamentally considered a process or an activity, which may lead one to the domain of patent protection but due to the activity being in the public domain since time immemorial protection under the Indian Patent Act 1970 is not possible for saree draping.

It can thus be concluded the present IP regime in India including trademarks, copyrights, patents, designs, and even GIs mainly protect the brand name and logo, the weave and fabric, the manufacturing process, the unique designs, or a combination of all of these, and the community for protecting/maintaining the standards and nurturing the culture and tradition as GIs. But neither of the above talk or provide protection to saree draping.  

How can India protect Saree Draping?

It is certain that the current IP regime in India cannot provide the much-needed protection to the myriad of saree draping styles prevalent in a culturally rich country like India. In such a scenario, India can develop the lesser-known branch of Intellectual Property Rights known as Traditional Knowledge which further incorporates Traditional Cultural Expressions. Saree draping styles perfectly fit under the WIPO definition for Traditional Cultural Expressions[2], as tangible forms of expression – folk costumes. Saree draping styles can be envisaged as folk / traditional costumes worn by when and women of communities. Thus, a well-codified law to protect such traditional knowledge or traditional cultural expressions which are passed from generation to generation could help to protect saree draping styles in India. However, locating the owner of the traditional cultural expressions and the fact that sarees are commonly worn in Nepal and Bangladesh, proprietor and territory issues may be common.

However, India can adopt the economic right ‘Domaine Public Payant’ to protect traditional cultural expressions such as saree draping styles.  According to this right, when the work enters the public domain after the normal period of protection expires, it cannot be used freely as in the case of normal free public domain. On contrary, it requires a royalty to be paid for the commercial use of the work.[3] Thus, any non-Indian who commercially exploits Indian saree draping styles would be required to pay a royalty or prescribed fee to the collecting society or equivalent. Till date, only 5-6 countries have adopted and incorporated this right and could be a feasible option for India to adopt to protect saree draping styles as Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expression. Saree is a prominent part of the Indian culture and a source of inspiration to fashion trends across the world. Protecting the different traditional ways of draping a saree is in fact an essential way to protect the diverse culture and traditions in India.


[1] Section 2 (c)(iii)

[2] https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/folklore/

[3] https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000143960

Place of origin matters..!

Some products or particular goods originate from a specific region or locality and has some special characteristics, qualities or reputation which is attributable to the place of origin. There are various factors governing this like the climate, soil, temperature, moisture and raw materials utilised the process of manufacturing or traditional methods and surely the human efforts that go in the preparation of such product. To make it more simple GI is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical reputation that is due to that origin. It promotes economic prosperity and boosts the exports also preserves cultural identity. In textile and handicrafts industries, fruits and nuts, Ayurvedic products – Triphala ashwagandha beverages etc.    
Here are some examples – Darjeeling tea, solapur bed sheets, oranges of Nagpur, kanjivaram silk and Swiss watches, kolhapuri chapals.

The significant difference between trademark and GI is that trademark is created to inform the consumers about the product while GI is identified by the particular place from which it originates. To determine the quality, reputation and characteristics a trademark can be licensed or assigned to anyone in the world for consideration and is owned by a particular company and not by a geographical place. Usually with GI the name of the place is always associated before the product for eg: Ratlam ki sev, Mathura ke pedhe, banarasi pan, amritsari chole, delhi chaat, ratnagiri hapus mangoes (local).

Special laws are also assigned to the protection of GIs, trademarks laws in from of collective marks and certification marks are intertwined with GIs. Consumer protection and laws against unfair competition etc. 

The reason why GI has thrived in recent years is as it fuels the marketing strategies and is used as a tool to grab the attention of the masses. Consumers want their product to be of certain quality & character that they may value. This has favoured the development of specific local markets or craftsman to produce such products linked to the place of origin. It gives the manufactures an added advantage as the good already has a goodwill attached to it due to GI.

BY

KASTURI MORE

LLB 1st Year

YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN LAW COLLEGE, PUNE

Muga Silk or Moonga Silk – The GI War

            Muga Silk is a type of silk, autochthonous to the state of Assam, depicting their culture and heritage. Mekhela Chador, the traditional attire of Assam, even worn by the Bihu Dancers is made from Muga Silk. Owning this traditional attire made of Muga Silk is considered a matter of pride for people in Assam. The use and existence of Muga silk were mentioned in Kautilya’s Arthashastra. The GI law restricts the registered indication to the authorised users of a particular territorial area. The unique natural golden yellow wild silk of Assam was protected under GI since 2006 owning to its importance in the state and its mention as one of the finest silks. But has this protection been sufficient to protect against counterfeit products or fulfil the very purpose of GI?

The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 provides the authorised user exclusive right to use the product for which the GI is registered[1]. Any other entity beyond the authorised user, using the same will result in infringement of law. Muga silk often faces tough competition from a type of silk known as Moonga Silk, sold in the markets of Delhi, Bihar, Jharkhand and UP. Moonga silk is further advertised using pictures of Muga Silk[2] and misguides the target audience in believing Muga Silk is synonymous to Moonga Silk. Many people are not aware about the characteristic natural golden yellow colour of Muga Silk and thus continue to buy Moonga silk considering it to be Muga Silk. The Silk Board of India has confirmed that Moonga Silk does not exist still it continues to be sold in the market synonymous to Muga Silk and no infringement action is taken against it. Even if infringement action is taken in the future, the burden of proof will lie on the users of Muga Silk to prove that sale of Moonga silk synonymous to Muga silk has diluted its image and that they have incurred substantial monetary losses and loss of reputation. The defendants of Moonga silk can easily defend by stating that Moonga is substantially different from Muga and there is no infringement of passion of the GI.

Muga vs Moonga is just one of the many instances where GI laws fail to adequately protect the registered GI products. Other textile products like Banarasi Silk sarees face tough competition from the synthetic fibre from China or states continue to fight over GI as in the case of Rasgulla GI war between West Bengal and Orissa. In India, rather than protecting the GI and obtaining a premium price for registered GI by the authorised users and benefitting the users and others who have a stake in the GI, emphasis is more on which states have a greater number of registered GI products. Hardly any GI infringement suits are filed against the infringer. The lack of awareness about GI laws, strategies and measures post-registration, no proper enforcement measures by the regulatory authorities and lack of brand building and advertising the GI further exacerbates the problem. It is time the authorities step up and take conclusive steps to deal with such infringing unlawful activities. In the present instance, the authorised users of  Muga silk should take proactive steps and measures against infringers of registered Muga Silk GI and keep it intact as the registered GI of Assam.


[1] Section 21

[2] https://www.exportersindia.com/m-r-handloom-fabrics/moonga-silk-fabric-1322041.htm

Chak-Hao (Black-Rice): Brightness in the dark

            Black aromatic rice, locally named as Chak-Hao Ambui, has been cultivated in the hills of Manipur in organic methods for over centuries. ‘Chak-Hao’ means delicious while ‘Ambui’ means black. This deep black coloured rice usually turns purple when cooked and is very popular not only inside but also outside Manipur in India. It is higher in weight than the other coloured rice varieties. Further, it is generally consumed by the Meitei community during religio-cultural events and rituals getting served as kheer, porridge, Chinese black cake, and many other dishes.

            Deservingly, having genuinely originated from Manipur, it has bagged the Geographical Indication (GI) tag this year in April 2020. Its application was filed by the Consortium of Producers of Chak-Hao, Manipur, and was facilitated by the Department of Agriculture, Government of Manipur and the North Eastern Regional Agricultural Marketing Corporation Limited (NERAMAC). Besides, it provides not only nutraceutical benefits but also plays a significant role in the socio-cultural practices of the local farmers.

Nutritional Uniqueness

            Black rice is grown in many parts of the world but an inherent unique property of this variety of rice is its pleasant aroma coupled with stickiness which is not common in the other varieties. Apart from its optimal content of fibre, vitamins, minerals, proteins, and many other nutrients, it is the only rice to contain anti-oxidants known as ‘anthocyanin’ that help reduce heart attack prospects, discard toxins and boost one’s immunity levels. It also helps prevent and cure certain types of cancer. Traditionally, it is given to pregnant women and is used as a medicine for diabetic patients. Besides, this rice takes the longest cooking time of 40-45 minutes due to the presence of a fibrous bran layer and higher crude fibre content and it turns deep purple once cooked.

Commercial value

            GIs have great potential to play a major role in trade. Chak-Hao is harvested only in India and China and is sold at Rs 100-120 a kilogram on average in the Imphal market. Its grains as well as its seeds can be sold to whoever gets inclined to trade, especially in the overseas markets, as the demand for the same is growing in the USA, Australia and Europe. Chak-Hao rice extracts could be a potential source of anti-oxidative phyto-chemicals and a useful ingredient for nutraceuticals and natural colourants rather than the toxic synthetic. Some of the nutraceutical compounds present which can be extracted economically are tocotrienols, gamma amini butyric acid, oryzanol, rice bran saccharine, lutein, zeaxanthin, butylate hydroanisole, phytosterol, etc.

Conclusion

Chak-Hao is a clear winner amongst all the types of rice. When harvested it is black in appearance but turns purple when cooked. Its pleasant nutty flavor completes any celebration. It is beneficial not only nutritionally, culturally but also commercially, having great market potential.

Doesn’t it make you try and cook this rice once at your home?

By

Deepika Pandey

2nd Year LLB Student

Bharati Vidyapeeth New Law College

Protection of Geographical Indicators In India

What is the first thing that involves your mind once you hear Mahabaleshwar? Once you hear Nagpur? Nashik Or Darjeeling? Isn’t it STRAWBERRIES, ORANGES, GRAPES, and TEA, respectively? As we all know these lip-smacking fruits and the tea are special because they derive their qualities from their places of production, let us understand more about their importance and protection of their originality.

            A geographical indication (GI) is essentially a place name that identifies the geographic source of a good and signifies a distinctive quality, reputation, or other characteristics of the good that is essentially attributable to that geographic source. GIs are protected as an Intellectual Property Right under the TRIPS agreement administered by the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, for the effective protection of GIs in India, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 is enacted. GIs can be used for both agricultural as well as industrial products.

Difference between a GI and Trademark

            GIs identify goods as originating from a particular place whereas trademarks identify goods as originating from a particular company. A GI can’t be assigned or licensed to anyone outside that place or not belonging to the group of authorized producers. By contrast, a trademark can be assigned or licensed to anyone anywhere in the world.

Registration  

            Registration of a GI is not mandatory in India. If registered, it’ll afford better legal protection to facilitate an action for infringement. Section 20 (1) of the GI Act states that nobody “shall” be entitled to institute any proceeding to prevent or to recover damages for, the infringement of an “unregistered” GI. The registration of a GI gives its registered owner and its authorized users the right to get relief for infringement. A GI is registered for a period of ten years and is subject to renewal of its registration at its tenth year to further remain registered for another ten years.

Status of GI Registrations in India

                        More than 300 GIs of Indian Origin has already been registered with the GI Registry. These include Basmati Rice, Pochampalli Ikat (textiles), Naga Mircha (Agricultural), Odisha Rasagola, Madhubani paintings, Thanjavur Doll (Handicraft), Banaras Brocades and Sarees, Kolhapuri Chappal, Alphonso Mango, Kolhapur Jaggery, Paithani Sarees, Kathputlis of Rajasthan, Mysore silk, Surat Zari Craft, East India Leather (Manufactured), Jamnagari Bandhani, Bagh Prints of Madhya Pradesh, Beed Custard Apple, Nizamabad Black Pottery, etc.

Recently, two more GIs got added to the list –

a)         Chak-Hao (Black-Rice): It is scented glutinous rice popularly known as “Black Rice”. It has been cultivated in Manipur for centuries.

b)         Kashmir Saffron: It is globally renowned as a unique spice. Its characteristics are longer and thicker stigmas, natural deep-red colour, high aroma, bitter flavor, chemical-free processing, and high quantity of crocin, safranal, and picrocrocin. It is very precious and costly.

            GI certification builds up the product’s reputation not just within the country but throughout the entire world. It is arduous to put each product produced by producers in diverse regions into the list of GIs. Therefore, the officials have set standards for a product to acquire a GI tag. GIs stand on an equal footing with other IPR. There is no difference in the level of protection granted to GIs in comparison with the protection of other fields of IPR. The GI tag is useful for not just producers but customers and the nation as well.

By

Deepika Pandey

2nd Year LLB Student

Bharati Vidyapeeth New Law College